The role of the police is to ensure that the law is obeyed. Have you been obeying the rules? He was disciplined for failing to obey orders. You can also find related words, phrases, and synonyms in the topics: Occurring and happening. Inability and awkwardness. Examples of obey. Obviously, these can be represented as languages over the output alphabet, namely as the set of outputs that obey them. From the Cambridge English Corpus.
It is straightforward to check the signs obey the partitioning condition. Its apparent diversity nonetheless obeys certain formative laws, the expressive and a priori structuring principles of the human mind itself. They paid taxes, obeyed administrators and contributed to military conscription, but strived to maintain cultural hegemony over what they considered as their sacred space.
Or we might say that by entering the military service, the private has tacitly or explicitly promised to obey orders from his superiors. In return for obeying the type rules, the programmer is rewarded with compile-time error messages instead of run-time bugs. They claimed to be simply obeying a directive that originated from no known source.
These relationships can never be grasped as merely causal, obeying some clear principle of mathematical logic. We may wish to consider only those sorted link graphs that obey some condition. Authority refers to the rightful exercise of power with the claim to be obeyed and relates to the legitimacy of a government branch.
What are the basic rules of life together in society? What would happen if there is no rules in our society? What are society rules? What are the 10 rules of life? What are the three rules of life? What are the four rules of life? What are the rules of life? What is the new life rule? What is a perfect lifestyle? How can I live an effective life? What is an example of lifestyle? What makes a perfect person? How can I make my life? By protecting employees, you protect the company from lawsuits.
Following rules and regulations help employees understand what is expected of them and what will happen if they violate the rules. It makes for a stable office environment where people feel safe to come to work, to be themselves and to go about their business. The result is less turnover, more teamwork and higher company morale. For the company, bottom line is profit. It costs money to recruit and onboard new people. Lack of innovation or inefficiency results in slower production times, thus lower revenues.
Company morale has a direct effect on employee performance, as well. Happier employees don't call in sick as frequently or come in late. People who feel safe at work will speak with co-workers to resolve problems faster and more effectively.
So, by having everyone follow properly communicated rules and regulations, the team does better; thus, the company makes more money. The teacher writes different opinions on the blackboard as to whether Schmitt should steal the money.
The teacher asks the students to choose an opinion they agree with and add their own reason in writing:. The different reasons are then discussed in class. Why are they different? Are some reasons better than others? The teacher then asks the students to complete this sentence:.
Alternatively the teacher could ask the class to think of as many reasons as they can as to why it is wrong to break the law. Typically, in answer to this question, people come up with a range of replies, including the following:. The teacher points out to the class that people have a range of reasons for obeying the law. Some of these have to do with self-interest, other reasons show concern for other people and some show a concern for the well-being of society as a whole see note below.
The different reasons should be written in the appropriate area. On the other hand, the story shows that from time to time even good people might have to consider breaking a particular law for a morally good reason. Examples might be breaking the speed limit in an emergency or defying a law because it is bad or unjust. Some of the students read their examples aloud in the plenary discussion. The teacher then underlines the distinction between moral responsibilities which people take upon themselves as part of their own values and beliefs and legal duties, which are imposed by governments.
The tensions between these two kinds of responsibility may lead citizens to criticise some laws they disagree with and to work to change them. They may even, on occasion, decide to break some laws for morally positive reasons.
History offers many examples of situations in which people have broken laws in order to protest against them or to rebel against tyrannical governments. The teacher should illustrate this with some local examples. The teacher should stress that such actions should not be taken lightly because of the danger of undermining the rule of law, upon which stable democracies depend.
This was one of a number of dilemmas Kohlberg and his colleagues put to young people every three years or so between the ages of 10 and It was found that over time young people, on average, progressed from using self-centred reasoning when they were young to using more person-centred reasoning in early adolescence. Then, in mid-adolescence, most of them showed a progression towards using society-centred reasoning, though the context and the type of dilemma can influence which type of reasoning people use at any one time.
Younger children have been shown to regard rules and laws as inflexible and based not on social purpose but solely on the authority of the rule maker. By adolescence, young people are more aware that laws have social purposes, which can be reviewed, questioned and criticised as being morally wrong or unfair.
Educating for democracy II. Growing up in democracy III. Living in democracy IV. Taking part in democracy V. Lesson 2: Why should people obey the law? Living Democracy » Textbooks » Lesson 2: Why should people obey the law?
What are the best reasons for obeying the law? To explore the distinction between moral and legal obligations. Student tasks Students analyse a moral dilemma in a plenary discussion. Students critically evaluate reasons for legal obedience.
0コメント